Skip to the content
kasoutsuka-casino

Thirty lists

Of the four fields, the number of coins separates operators the least

The number of coins is a field people look at when choosing a crypto casino by name. Across a record of 100 operators we could read the list for 30, and the lengths ran from 1 to 40. But the median is 8.5, and 18 of the 30 stop at nine or fewer. The difference sits in the tail, not at the front.

Only 30 publish a list

Of the 100 in the record, the names of accepted coins could be read for 30.

The other 70 cells are empty.

Here too a blank means “we could not read it”, not “they accept no coins”. It is not unusual for an operator to lead with crypto deposits and never gather the accepted coins into one place. A name appearing somewhere on a screen is not a list, and what cannot be read as a list is not counted.

Thirty out of 100 is three in ten.

From 1 to 40, but the median is 8.5

Order the 30 readable lists by length and the shortest carries one entry and the longest 40. A fortyfold spread.

The median is still 8.5.

Eighteen of the 30 stop at nine or fewer. Four sit at ten, six between 12 and 15, one at 19, one at 40. The weight of the distribution is low down, and a list of 40 is an outlier.

“A wide range of coins”, in this distribution, is a statement about the top two lists.

The names at the front are the same everywhere

Count how often each name appears across the whole record of 100 and the order is clear.

BTC 29 times, ETH 28, LTC and USDT 23 each. Then DOGE 18, BNB and XRP 15 each, BCH and TRX 14 each, SOL and USDC 13 each.

The front of a 40-coin list and the front of an 8-coin list carry the same names.

The difference is in the tail. What a long list has is more rarely used coins. Measured by the coins a reader would actually deposit with, an operator listing 40 and an operator listing 8 come out almost the same.

Which is why this field separates operators the least of the four. It sits in the table to show what an operator published, not to rank anything.

The lists among the ten in the table

Of the ten operators in this site's table, eight have a readable list.

Rocketpot and Wolf.bet at 13, Wild.io at 12, DuckDice at 10, Rainbet at 9, Metaspins at 8, Vave and Shuffle at 6.

Empire.io and Bitsler have no readable list, so those cells stay empty.

Shuffle's six include a token the operator issues itself. When counting list length we count such tokens as one entry like any other: what an operator put on its own list is not removed by our judgment.

Ten operators. Every cell is taken from a licence register or from the operator's own terms. A blank means we could not read it — never “zero”, never “no limit”. There is no column for a Japanese licence, because Japan has no licensing regime for online casinos to issue one.
OperatorLicenceBefore the ID checkCoinsBarred countriesOpen
VaveCuraçao Gaming Authorityno figure given6list unreadOpen
RocketpotCuracaoUS$2,5001334
DuckDiceAnjouan Gaming Boardno figure given1016
Empire.ioAnjouan Gaming Board2,000 USDTunread12
MetaspinsCuraçao Gaming Authorityno figure given858
RainbetAnjouan Gaming Boardno figure given911
ShuffleCuraçao Gaming Authorityno figure given615
Wild.ioCuraçao Gaming Authorityno figure given1245
Wolf.betAnjouanno figure given1348
BitslerCuraçao Gaming Authorityno figure givenunread1

Vave is this site's commercial partner, and the link on that row is paid placement: if a reader opens an account, this site is paid. The order of the table is not set by that payment. Vave is excluded from every count and every ranking on this page. We have not read its list of barred countries, so that cell stays “list unread”.

Operators marked “crypto only”

Fourteen operators in the record carry a marker for handling crypto exclusively. Among the ten in the table, three do: Rocketpot, Metaspins and Wolf.bet.

That marker is a separate matter from the number of coins.

Handling crypto only also means that country-specific payment methods are unavailable. From a reader's side, that is not a wider set of options but a set narrowed to one. This site does not rate which is better, but the two are different facts.

On the yen, our record has no field showing how it is treated, so this site writes nothing about depositing or withdrawing in yen. Filling an absent field by inference would stop it being the operator's words. The test is set out in how we read the terms.

Three things the coin count does not answer

The length of a list answers none of the following.

How many days a withdrawal takes. The amount at which papers are asked for. Whether an account from Japan is accepted.

All three live in other documents.

The amount before papers sits in the identity-check clause, and only five of 100 print a figure. The payout ceiling sits in another clause, and only 14 print one. The country question sits in the barred-country list, and we could read only 38. The detail is on the identity-check page, the payout-ceiling page and the barred-countries page.

An operator with many coins has not necessarily filled in any of those. The three fields are independent of each other.

Checking it yourself

The list of coins usually sits with the deposit and withdrawal information, or in an FAQ. It is not always in the body of the terms.

When counting, count only where the coins are gathered as a list.

A strip of logos at the foot of a page is sometimes decoration rather than a statement of what is accepted. We record only what could be read as a list.

If no list can be found, you can stop there. That it could not be found is the record for that operator. The other three checks are on the check-it-yourself page, and how to pull a number is on the licence page.

Questions

How many operators publish a list of accepted coins?
Thirty out of 100. The other 70 cells are empty, and that means “we could not read the list”, not “they accept no coins”.
How far apart are the longest and shortest lists?
Forty entries against one — a fortyfold spread. But the median is 8.5, and 18 of the 30 stop at nine or fewer. Long lists are the exception.
Which coins come up most often?
Across the whole record of 100: BTC 29 times, ETH 28, LTC and USDT 23 each, then DOGE 18, and BNB and XRP 15 each. The names at the front look much the same regardless of how long the list is.
How many lists could you read among the ten in the table?
Eight. Rocketpot and Wolf.bet at 13 coins, Wild.io at 12, DuckDice at 10, Rainbet at 9, Metaspins at 8, Vave and Shuffle at 6. Empire.io and Bitsler have no readable list, so those cells stay empty.
Can I use Japanese yen?
Our record has no field showing how the yen is treated at all, so this site writes nothing about depositing or withdrawing in yen. The rule against filling an empty field by inference is set out in how we read the terms.
Is an operator with more coins better?
This site does not write better or worse. The count shows the length of a list and nothing else — not whether a withdrawal goes through, not the amount at which papers are asked for. Those are answered by the identity-check field and the payout ceiling.

Written by the kasoutsuka-casino desk

we read operators' terms and licence registers Updated 3 September 2026